<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richmond Tea Party &#187; Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richmondteaparty.com/tag/health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dethroning Czars: At the Heart of Unraveling Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/02/dethroning-czars-at-the-heart-of-unraveling-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/02/dethroning-czars-at-the-heart-of-unraveling-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnPride</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=5843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Representatives voted Thursday to eliminate funding for nine “Czars” in the Obama Administration. The affected posts include health care, energy and climate, green jobs, urban affairs, the closure of the Guantanamo Bay, oversight of TARP executive compensation, diversity at the Federal Communications Commission and the auto industry manufacturing policy. “Czar” is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The House of Representatives <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=81BDF2E7-F50D-4CC0-93F5-B172FB2CE18F">voted</a> Thursday to eliminate funding for nine “Czars” in the Obama Administration. The affected posts include health care, energy and climate, green jobs, urban affairs, the closure of the Guantanamo Bay, oversight of TARP executive compensation, diversity at the Federal Communications Commission and the auto industry manufacturing policy.

“Czar” is a term pertaining to a variety of positions reporting directly to an administration. The designation can include Undersecretary positions in Cabinet departments, oversight of emergency responses,  advisers typical of many administrations and offices created in order  to apply ideological intent to Federal administration.

In my view, the issue is not that the Obama administration has <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/07/list-obama-administration-czars/">more “czars” </a>than, say, the Bush administration. It is their individual resumes, stated beliefs and the ideological intent of their actions that give pause. To apply the full weight of influence of the Executive Branch to the fuzzy science of global warming (Climate Czar) brings to question the value of a Science Czar. After delivering General Motors to the United Auto Workers union immediately after taking office, one may doubt the objective purpose of an Auto Recovery Czar and a Car Czar.

And, why we do we bother with a Border Czar, a Mideast Peace Czar, an Oil Spill Czar, a Stimulus Accountability Czar, and an Ethics Czar? In addition, after the sleazy dealings and broadly-demonstrated incompetence of this Administration, who really finds comfort in the “boot on your throat” shadow of Cyber, FCC Diversity, Information, Intelligence, Regulatory, Intellectual Property and Economic Czars?

I’d like Congress to defund and investigate the Obama Administration at every opportunity, and I applaud the House for this start. My only question is: What’s next, then next, and so on?<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/02/dethroning-czars-at-the-heart-of-unraveling-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ObamaCare ruled unconstitutional, law must be declared void</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/01/obamacare-ruled-unconstitutional-law-must-be-declared-void/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/01/obamacare-ruled-unconstitutional-law-must-be-declared-void/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JoeGuarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Henry Hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Richard Vinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=5657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a.k.a., ObamaCare, was ruled unconstitutional today by Florida Judge Roger Vinson.  And because the &#8220;individual mandate&#8221; to purchase health insurance was thrown out, he also wrote in his decision that the entire law must be declared void. In his decision, Vinson wrote: &#8220;While the individual mandate was clearly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a.k.a., <a title="ObamaCare unconstitutional" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/31/judges-ruling-health-care-lawsuit-shift-momentum-coverage-debate/" target="_self">ObamaCare, was ruled unconstitutional</a> today by Florida Judge Roger Vinson.  And because the &#8220;individual mandate&#8221; to purchase health insurance was thrown out, he also wrote in his decision that the entire law must be declared void.

In his decision, Vinson wrote: &#8220;While the individual mandate was clearly &#8216;necessary and essential&#8217; to the act as drafted, it is not &#8216;necessary and essential&#8217; to health care reform in general.&#8221; He continued, &#8220;Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire act must be declared void.&#8221;

This is the second decision in two months to rule ObamaCare unconstitutional. Six weeks ago, Virginia Judge Henry Hudson ruled that the individual mandate was unconstitutional, but did not go as far as Vinson in throwing out the entire law.

The federal government will surely seek a stay on the ruling until the US Supreme Court can hear the case and make its decision.  Legal scholars anticipate that won&#8217;t happen until the fall of 2012 because the cases with decisions so far will have to proceed through the appellate courts this year. Precedent does exist, however, for having the case fast-tracked over the appellate courts and directly to the Supreme Court.<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/01/obamacare-ruled-unconstitutional-law-must-be-declared-void/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US House to vote to repeal ObamaCare</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/01/us-house-to-vote-to-repeal-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/01/us-house-to-vote-to-repeal-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 05:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JoeGuarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=5325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to reports from Capitol Hill newspapers, the US House plans to take a vote on repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a.k.a., ObamaCare, next Wednesday, January 12.  Because the Republicans are in the majority, they will be keeping their campaign promise to make repeal of the law a top-tier issue.  They [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to reports from Capitol Hill newspapers, the US House plans to take a vote on repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a.k.a., ObamaCare, next Wednesday, January 12.  Because the Republicans are in the majority, they will be keeping their campaign promise to make repeal of the law a top-tier issue.  They are also keeping another promise by posting the <a title="US bill to repeal ObamaCare" href="http://rules-republicans.house.gov/Media/PDF/HR__-Repeal.pdf">bill </a>online well in advance of the vote.

The expected victory will be short-lived, however, as the Democrat-controlled Senate is not likely to pass the repeal measure.  Even if they did, the president would veto it.

Instead, as the 112th Congress proceeds, House Republicans will pursue other efforts to make implementation of ObamaCare very difficult.  Where they can, the GOP will defund it or not fund various provisions, such as money for additional IRS agents to enforce the individual mandate to purchase health insurance.

During 2010, Democrats in both the House and Senate did not hold one committee hearing on further examination of the new law or its implementation.  House Republican leaders have vowed to hold extensive hearings on the PPACA.  One committee leader has already said he intends to create a special parking space outside of the committee&#8217;s hearing room just for US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.  The Department of HHS has been charged with carrying out the bulk of the new law.<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2011/01/us-house-to-vote-to-repeal-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VA Judge Rules Insurance Mandate Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/12/va-judge-rules-insurance-mandate-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/12/va-judge-rules-insurance-mandate-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JoeGuarino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=5052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a decision that was expected, US Fourth District Court Judge Henry Hudson ruled in a 42-page opinion that the federal government overstepped its powers enumerated in the US Constitution when it passed a law requiring that all Americans must purchase health insurance. Also known as the &#8220;individual mandate,&#8221; the judge ruled that the federal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In a decision that was expected, US Fourth District Court Judge Henry Hudson ruled in a 42-page <a title="VA v. Sebelius 4th Dist Ct decision" href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3174287/Opinion.pdf">opinion </a>that the federal government overstepped its powers enumerated in the US Constitution when it passed a law requiring that all Americans must purchase health insurance. Also known as the &#8220;individual mandate,&#8221; the judge ruled that the federal government has no authority to tell Americans what to purchase.

Two other judges earlier this year in other cases ruled that the individual mandate is constitutional. The decision today now makes the score 2-1. Numerous other similar cases are awaiting decisions across the country. Because of the differences between the courts so far, the final decision will have to be made by the US Supreme Court.

Typically, the losing side in a district court decision will appeal the decision to the next level of the court system, namely, the Appellate Court. However, more and more experts and insiders are conjecturing that the issue at hand may leapfrog the appeal process and go directly to the US Supreme Court. If it does, a decision could be rendered by the fall of 2011. If not, it would not be decided until the fall of 2012. The individual mandate is slated to go into effect January 1, 2014.

Earlier this year, the Richmond TEA Party, along with Campaign for Liberty, the 9-12 groups, and other TEA Parties, led efforts to pass the VA Health Care Freedom Act. According to VA AG Ken Cuccinelli, its passage gave VA &#8220;better standing&#8221; to sue the federal government.<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/12/va-judge-rules-insurance-mandate-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Waivers Just Keep on Comin’</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/11/and-the-waivers-just-keep-on-comin%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/11/and-the-waivers-just-keep-on-comin%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LibertyJon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathleen Sebelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=4694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when I told you about the health care waivers the Obama Administration was granting selected corporations? At the time, the number was 30. It’s now well past 100.  Michelle Malkin tells us: Now comes word that Torquemada HHS Secretay Kathleen Sebelius has approved a whopping 111 waivers for businesses of all sizes, along with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Remember when <a href="http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/10/too-big-for-mandates/" target="_blank">I told you</a> about the health care waivers the Obama Administration was granting selected corporations? At the time, the number was 30. It’s now well past 100. 

Michelle Malkin <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/11/14/waiver-mania-the-ever-expanding-obamacare-escapee-list/" target="_blank">tells us</a>:
<blockquote>Now comes word that <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2010/09/15/the-obamacare-inquisitions-a-brief-brutish-history/"><strong>Torquemada</strong></a> HHS Secretay Kathleen Sebelius has approved <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/health/policy/10waiver.html"><strong>a whopping 111 waivers</strong></a> for businesses of all sizes, along with more unions and other providers of health insurance. The escapees include employers of many low-wage and part-time workers whose health insurance plans would otherwise be dropped, including Darden Restaurants — the parent company of the Olive Garden and Red Lobster and other chains, which employ some 34,000 people.</blockquote>
You can see the entire list <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/ociio/regulations/approved_applications_for_waiver.html" target="_blank">here</a>.

Does anyone out there with a shred of objectivity still seriously believe the health care law was a good idea? If so, why is it good only for some, but not for others? We simple-minded Tea Party folk would like to know. <div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/11/and-the-waivers-just-keep-on-comin%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Reasons, and Then Some, to VOTE November 2nd</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/10/five-reasons-and-then-some-to-vote-november-2nd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/10/five-reasons-and-then-some-to-vote-november-2nd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnPride</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Congressional Races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional adherence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtue and accountability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=4331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Constitutional Adherence 2. Limited Government 3. Fiscal responsibility 4. Virtue and Accountability 5. Free markets I’ve listed the five Tea Party Principles above as a reminder to us  all that we started this rebellion over far more than recent frustrations and indignation. We recognized that Tarp, Stimulus, Health Care, soaring unemployment and an economy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[1. Constitutional Adherence
2. Limited Government
3. Fiscal responsibility
4. Virtue and Accountability
5. Free markets

I’ve listed the five Tea Party Principles above as a reminder to us  all that we started this rebellion over far more than recent frustrations and indignation. We recognized that Tarp, Stimulus, Health Care, soaring unemployment and an economy destroyed by taxpayer-financed ideology are all part of a very real American tragedy.

We’ve been called lairs, racists, bigots, fools and losers. Our intelligence has been prejudged. Our questions have been shrugged off by men and women too ideologically invested to scratch layers of deceit as obvious as the film on a lottery ticket.  All of this was as predictable as it is sobering.

In truth, our motivation stems from a realization that there have been decades of preparation and conditioning for this very moment in American time. We looked up a few years ago and saw bold writing on a wall being whitewashed even as we repeated what we read, yet we have never stopped shining the light of reality upon very unreal events.

Let me give you five other reasons to believe in our efforts, and to VOTE November 2nd:

1. We are asking to reconcile the financial crisis as soon as possible, on our backs, not content to pass it forward as we receive checks and benefits that indenture Americans for generations to come.

2. We recognize that to compromise with those we oppose is to assure their absolute victory as a slightly lessened pace.

3. We believe in the inherent wisdom and self-determination of an informed people, all people, over the self-serving non-benevolence of leaders wrapped in caring and correctness.

4. We have much more to do after the election than we have done thus far, and we are fully prepared to continue to shine the light of truth on those whom we elect.  We will represent all citizens for decades to come, not so much as  political party, but as keepers of the principles which allow our republic to remain truly free.

5. We are the descendants of every national and ethnic background, Americans without hyphenation and with no agenda beyond the five principles listed above.

Our ranks are growing as support for those we oppose has plummeted. We are winning the battle for hearts and minds because it has proven impossible for our detractors to hide lies and desperation. We will prevail because we will hold our own leadership to account at every turn, and this transparency will draw increasing numbers to our ranks as the months and years pass.

Let’s vote, America, and then let us get to the real work, much too long delayed.<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/10/five-reasons-and-then-some-to-vote-november-2nd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Reasons Why Congress Hates the Tea Party &amp; Patriot groups (and why you should register for the Oct. 8-9 Virginia Tea Party Patriots Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/top-ten-reasons-why-congress-hates-the-tea-party-patriot-groups-and-why-you-should-register-for-the-oct-8-9-virginia-tea-party-patriots-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/top-ten-reasons-why-congress-hates-the-tea-party-patriot-groups-and-why-you-should-register-for-the-oct-8-9-virginia-tea-party-patriots-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Congressional Races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt/Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[We the People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=3559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Ten Reasons Why Congress Hates the Tea Party &#38; Patriot groups (and why you should register for the Oct. 8-9 Virginia Tea Party Patriots Convention at www.vateapartyconvention.com): 10. Most Tea Party &#38; Patriot group supporters actually work for a living, and it’s human nature not to like people who are so very different from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Top Ten Reasons Why Congress Hates the Tea Party &amp; Patriot groups (and why you should register for the Oct. 8-9 Virginia Tea Party Patriots Convention at <a href="http://www.vateapartyconvention.com">www.vateapartyconvention.com</a>):

10. Most Tea Party &amp; Patriot group supporters actually <em>work</em> for a living, and it’s human nature not to like people who are <em>so</em> very different from you.
9. One word: emails.
8. Tea Party &amp; Patriot group supporters won’t shut up and eat their cake.
7. Qualifying for a lifetime pension the day they take office apparently isn’t enough for members of Congress.
6. Two other words: phone calls.
5. Tea Party &amp; Patriot group supporters APPARENTLY ARE NOT READING THE FORM LETTERS THAT THEIR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ARE SENDING THEM.
4. Tea Party &amp; Patriot group supporters are crazy lunatics obsessed with things like the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
3. Tea Party &amp; Patriot group supporters act like Congress works for <em>them</em>. What’s up with that?
2. How can anyone who doesn&#8217;t have a personal driver know anything about how the country should be run?
1. Tea Party &amp; Patriot group supporters seem to think that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

<strong>Want to really aggravate Congress?</strong>
Come to the first annual Virginia Tea Party Patriots Convention on Oct. 8-9 at the Greater Richmond Convention Center! REGISTER NOW at <a href="http://www.vatteapartyconvention.com" class="broken_link">www.vatteapartyconvention.com</a>.
<ul>
	<li>See nationally known keynote speakers like Lou Dobbs, Dick Morris, John Fund, Herman Cain, JennyBeth Martin, Ginni Thomas and Bishop E.W. Jackson.</li>
	<li>Attend Seminars on Constitution, Public Policy and Grassroots Training.</li>
	<li>During the National Policy Forum, hear from policy experts such as Congressman Ron Paul, Congressman Steve King, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, former Virginia governor and U.S. Senator George Allen, and others.</li>
	<li>Take part in the first Presidential Straw Poll of the 2012 campaign – <strong>WHO DO YOU WANT TO GET A JUMP START ON UNSEATING THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION? MAKE IT HAPPEN HERE!!</strong></li>
	<li>Party hard at the Friday Night Freedom Lovers Extravaganza (only $20/ticket)!</li>
</ul>
<strong>REGISTER NOW at </strong><a href="http://www.vatteapartyconvention.com" class="broken_link"><strong>www.vatteapartyconvention.com</strong></a>

The Virginia Tea Party Patriots Convention is being presented by the Virginia Tea Party Patriots Federation. For more information, go to <a href="http://www.virginiateapartypatriots.com">www.virginiateapartypatriots.com</a>.

For general information: <a href="mailto:info@vateapartyconvention.com">info@vateapartyconvention.com</a>

For sponsor / vendor information: <a href="mailto:sponsors@vateapartyconvention.com">sponsors@vateapartyconvention.com</a>

To leave us a message via phone, please call: (888) 567-6896.

<strong>REGISTER NOW at </strong><a href="http://www.vatteapartyconvention.com" class="broken_link"><strong>www.vatteapartyconvention.com</strong></a><strong>.</strong><div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/top-ten-reasons-why-congress-hates-the-tea-party-patriot-groups-and-why-you-should-register-for-the-oct-8-9-virginia-tea-party-patriots-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future Under ObamaCare</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/the-future-under-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/the-future-under-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LibertyJon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Clear Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=3291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Real Clear Politics, this article shows us our future under ObamaCare, if we fail to repeal it. This has already been tried before with disastrous results, both in Canada and Massachusetts. The author writes  With health care now effectively &#8220;free&#8221; &#8212; that is, paid for by other taxpayers &#8212; Canadians began visiting the doctor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/" target="_blank">Real Clear Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/08/17/why_obamacare_must_be_repealed_106780.html" target="_blank">this article</a> shows us our future under ObamaCare, if we fail to repeal it. This has already been tried before with disastrous results, both in Canada and Massachusetts. The author writes 
<blockquote>With health care now effectively &#8220;free&#8221; &#8212; that is, paid for by other taxpayers &#8212; Canadians began visiting the doctor twice as much. Exploding demand drove up costs. To keep spending under control, the federal government simply reduced how much it sent to provinces to run the system. Provinces in turn cut payments to doctors and covered fewer services and cutting-edge treatments.

At first, doctors responded by billing patients directly for amounts greater than the government reimbursements. But in 1984, the federal government outlawed such practices &#8212; thereby banning private delivery of services covered under the Canada Health Act. At this point, the Canadian government effectively controlled health care in the country.

The Canadian experience offers a preview of what Obamacare has in store for the United States.</blockquote>
As more facts and analyses are provided on ObamaCare, Americans are quickly catching on that they’ve been had. And now <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law" target="_blank">they want it to go away</a>.

It&#8217;s critical we find and support candidates this November who are committed to <em>fully</em> repealing ObamaCare and preventing the future destruction of our great health care system. Once that’s done, then we can set to work on actually fixing the broken pieces of our system with commonsense (i.e., non-government based) solutions.<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/the-future-under-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuccinelli gives report on health care lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/cuccinelli-gives-report-on-health-care-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/cuccinelli-gives-report-on-health-care-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Freedom Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=3151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We received the following update from Attorney General Cuccinelli today on the status of the health care lawsuit. Pay careful attention to the credit he gives to the Virginia Tea Party movement at the end! &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- August 8, 2010 Dear Friends, Okay folks, last week was a busy week with the health care ruling (which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We received the following update from Attorney General Cuccinelli today on the status of the health care lawsuit. Pay careful attention to the credit he gives to the Virginia Tea Party movement at the end!

&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-
August 8, 2010


Dear Friends, 

Okay folks, last week was a busy week with the health care ruling (which we were expecting, without knowing the outcome) and the immigration explosion (which we were not really expecting).

To sum up re immigration, the only people really surprised by my legal opinion on the subject were people unfamiliar with law enforcement&#8217;s authority.  Of course, that includes the press, so they went nuts.  Let&#8217;s leave this topic for another day because the health care suit is so important, that it warrants discussion before all other current topics.
 
Last Monday &#8211; The End of Round 1
On July 1st, we had oral argument in Virginia&#8217;s health care lawsuit against the federal government.  The feds had filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the case without deciding the constitutionality of the health care bill.
 
In the morning of August 2nd, the Judge denied the federal government&#8217;s motion to dismiss the case &#8211; rejecting every single argument advanced by the feds in support of their motion.
 
Virginia had to win on every argument at this stage, because if the court found that there was even one reason that the case should not go forward, it would have ended right there.
 
Every constitutional law case includes at least two rounds.  Round 1 is the motion to dismiss, typically including claims by the government that the plaintiff is not injured or that their injury is not &#8220;ripe,&#8221; i.e., it hasn&#8217;t happened yet.
 
Our case included both of those arguments, plus two more.
 
The Feds&#8217; Attacks
The federal government made four separate attacks on our complaint:

1)     That Virginia was not injured by the health care law (&#8220;HC law&#8221;);

2)     That even if Virginia was injured, such injury was not ripe because the individual mandate does not come into effect until January 1, 2014;

3)     The Anti-Injunction Act bars Virginia&#8217;s suit; and

4)     That Virginia has not stated a claim on which relief could be granted. This is the one that begins to touch on the substance of the constitutional claims, and it has three sub-parts in which the feds claimed that the HC law was constitutional under the commerce clause, the taxing power, and the necessary and proper clause.
 
Virginia&#8217;s Responses
Not surprisingly, we resisted the feds&#8217; motion to dismiss.  In summary fashion, here is what Virginia argued in defense of the legitimacy of its lawsuit:

1)     Virginia was injured because our own Health Care Freedom Act (&#8220;HCFA&#8221;) protects Virginians from a health insurance mandate, and absent action by the courts, the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution would have the HC law trumping our HCFA.  That would be fine under our constitutional system, except for the fact that the HC law is unconstitutional.  So, because Virginia would lose the right to maintain its own law because of the HC law, Virginia is injured. The court agreed.

2)     Virginia argued that the case is ripe under the law because the Supreme Court has generally said that if the only thing that needs to happen between now and a legal collision is the passage of time, then the case is ripe.  There are no contingencies left.  Virginia&#8217;s HCFA is in effect.  The federal HC law is in effect.  They will collide on January 1, 2014 absent a ruling favorable to Virginia, thus the case is ripe.  The court agreed.

A funny item that happened here &#8230; as you know, the Florida case is going on at the same time as Virginia&#8217;s.  And on June 16th the feds filed their motion to dismiss in that case.  In their Florida brief, the made three different statements that were helpful to us in our case.  One of them was their citation of case law that says exactly what I said in the paragraph before this one.  So, to their surprise, we cited their Florida brief in our oral argument!

3)     The Anti-Injunction Act (&#8220;AIA&#8221;) says that before you can sue on a tax law, you have to pay the tax.  Needless to say, Virginia&#8217;s position is that the &#8216;penalty&#8217; is not a tax, AND Virginia would never, under any circumstances, have to pay the penalty! So, the AIA does not apply in this case.  The court agreed.

4)     The big one&#8230; because it&#8217;s more than one.  Basically, the feds claimed that even if the court accepted our complaint in its entirety, we still couldn&#8217;t win.  Often said by lawyers as &#8216;not stating a claim upon which relief may be granted.&#8217;

The judge&#8217;s comments here were looked at most closely for hints about what he may do in his summary judgment ruling later, as all of these subjects will be the focus of that round.

Regarding the claim by the feds that the commerce clause provides them the authority to enact the HC law, the judge said that that may be true (he didn&#8217;t decide it yet), but if so, it will be the new outer limit of commerce clause jurisprudence.  He said the HC law goes farther than anything that has been found constitutional ever before.  So, we&#8217;re in constitutional never, never land re the commerce clause.  Such a state of affairs needs to be addressed according to the judge, so the case will go on.

The judge proceeded to say basically the same thing about the taxing power.  Again, we&#8217;re in &#8220;never, never land&#8221; regarding the taxing power.

The judge didn&#8217;t really say much about the necessary and proper clause. This clause is used to &#8216;fill in&#8217; the power provided to the federal government under the other clauses, though it&#8217;s not supposed to extend that power.

Of special interest was the judge focusing on our characterization of what was (or was not) going on re the individual mandate in the HC law.  He talked a bit about the fact that what was being regulated (or an attempt was being made to regulate) was inactivity.  I liked the word he chose: &#8220;repose.&#8221;  A state of repose &#8211; i.e., doing nothing.
 
So, what&#8217;s next?
 
What&#8217;s Next

How&#8217;s that for a transition?
 
From early September to early October, both sides will file motions for summary judgment and oppositions and replies (3 briefs per side).  Additionally, amici will file their briefs by early October.
 
Then, on October 18th we will have oral argument on the constitutionality of the HC law.
 
If the judge does what he did at oral argument on the motion to dismiss, he&#8217;ll tell us at that time about how long he expects to take to decide and issue an opinion.  Best guess now? Around Thanksgiving, but we&#8217;ll see.  Maybe longer, probably not shorter.
 
Whichever side loses will undoubtedly appeal, and whoever loses there will appeal the Supreme Court.  I would be shocked if they didn&#8217;t take this case, so that&#8217;s who is ultimately going to decide the outcome.
 
Regardless, I&#8217;d always rather go to round two having already won round one!  And this week, we survived by winning round one.
 
I want to remind all of you that haven&#8217;t already done so, please go to our web site at www.Cuccinelli.com, and watch the video discussion on the case.  It&#8217;s very educational and it will help prepare you to discuss the case with your friends and neighbors.
 
While it would be nice if we didn&#8217;t have to worry about such an unconstitutional bill, it is an opportunity to explain first principles to folks, so please take advantage of this educational moment!
 
Finally, on a side note, and as sort of a distant reminder&#8230; the Virginia HCFA is a big part of our case.  It is what distinguishes our case from the Florida case, and because of it, you may see very different courses for the two cases.  The Virginia HCFA was the major legislative effort of the Tea Parties in Virginia last year, so all of you Tea Party types that helped get Virginia&#8217;s HCFA &#8211; thank you &#8211; as it was an important element in the motion to dismiss.  Specifically, it provided a sovereign injury &#8211; the trumping of Virginia&#8217;s law under the supremacy clause &#8211; that was an important part of why we survived the motion to dismiss.  Again, thanks to all that supported that effort!
 
Sincerely,

Ken Cuccinelli, II
Attorney General of Virginia

<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/08/cuccinelli-gives-report-on-health-care-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will We Learn From Greece&#8217;s Health Care Disaster?</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/06/will-we-learn-from-greeces-health-care-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/06/will-we-learn-from-greeces-health-care-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LibertyJon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondteaparty.com/?p=2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve been tracking the meltdown of Greece and the European economy on this blog, which has all happened, of course, because of out of control government spending. And because our politicians are following the same path for America, all we have to do is look to Europe to see our future.  We have just passed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We’ve been tracking the meltdown of Greece and the European economy on this blog, which has all happened, of course, because of out of control government spending. And because our politicians are following the same path for America, all we have to do is look to Europe to see our future. 

We have just passed a healthcare bill that issues massive regulations on private sector health insurance. How’s that going to work out for us? The Cypress Times shows us how <a href="http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/News/Opinion_Editorial/OBAMACARE_TRIED_IN_GREECE_LEADS_TO_BANKRUPTCY_RIOTING_BLOODSHED/30793" target="_blank">Greece is doing with it</a>:
<blockquote>In 1983, when the socialists were in power, Greece established &#8220;health care for all.&#8221; Today government spending is unsustainable and Greece is awash in red ink. Talks of budget cuts and program cutbacks are causing rioting and bloodshed.

The Greek system is employer- based but the Greek Ministry of Social Health and Cohesion has enacted strict regulations so that innovation cannot exist. Employers must choose from government-approved insurers, with rates and benefits packages clearly delineated. This sounds much like ObamaCare&#8211; private but heavily regulated insurance.</blockquote>
From the same article, even the International Monetary Fund, which is determined to bail out Europe with your money, said that
<blockquote>before any bailouts are considered, the Greek government must privatize transportation, energy and health care to rein in costs. The IMF recognizes that increased government involvement in health care does not save money. It also does not lead to better health care.</blockquote>
What is it we’re missing about this? How much more will it take for Americans to learn that high government spending and regulations <em>never</em> work?

Actually, I think most Americans <em>have</em> learned this. It is our politicians whose careers are spent coming up with creative ways to spend other people’s money and expanding their own power that continue to take us down the road to financial disaster. But with Europe collapsing before our eyes and a government focused health care approach playing a significant role, we must find a way to force our elected officials to repeal ObamaCare. As soon as possible.<div class='wb_fb_bottom'><div style="float:right;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondteaparty.com/2010/06/will-we-learn-from-greeces-health-care-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 14/74 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1393/1556 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.richmondteaparty.com @ 2012-02-04 04:00:41 -->
