Paul Ryan Energizes 2000+ in Glen Allen
In case you missed it…
Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan was here in Virginia yesterday morning. Rep. Ryan continues to draw capacity crowds everywhere he goes, and today Virginians did not disappoint. CBS reports that supporters started showing up as early as 2am this morning.
A week since presidential candidate Mitt Romney announced him as his running mate, Ryan has been on the campaign trail, grinding away. You can definitely tell this by his voice (a bit crackly now), but his tone is serious as ever, especially when addressing the current administrations attempts to distract America from a disastrous record of failed policies.
“‘Hope and Change’ has become ‘Attack and Blame’,”the Wisconsin congressman affirmed.
Later in his speech, he laid down something I think we Tea Partiers are all so anxious to not just hear, but to truly believe again. He concluded, “This is our commitment – we will not duck the tough issues. We will lead.”
Yes sir, I believe you will. Now lead on. Or as the senior citizens in Warren, Ohio, say, “Good luck! Kick a**!”
Here’s the video of his rousing speech at Deep Run High School. (hat tip: therightscoop)
Crank it up.
Paul Ryan Speech in Glen Allen
One Response to Paul Ryan Energizes 2000+ in Glen Allen
Leave a Reply
Posts
-
City of Richmond Responds to Our Refund Request
by JonWakefield - 30 Comments
-
Update: City of Richmond Audit of RTP
by Aha - 21 Comments
- Democrats to Shove Health Care Down Your Throat this Week by Jamie - 20 Comments
- Tea Parties Come Together Nationally For Media Collaboration by JonWakefield - 19 Comments
- Greece is AIG; Guess Who’s Playing the U.S. Taxpayer? by JJac - 17 Comments
karen farrow: CONFIRMED: IRS Targeted Tea Party Groups (Updated)
Aldous Snow: RTP Executive Director Update
johnnelle raines: Stop the Common Core
Bob Hines: Tea Party Q&A with Larry Nordvig
Jack Lee: Update from the Executive Director
PARDON, but
Honorable Mr Ryan, a nominal Roman Catholic, has exuded worshipful praise for Ayn Rand – a prominent radical ANTI-CHRISTIAN – praising her more than any respect he has expressed for any Catholic teaching or any Catholic saint.
Ayn Rand, about whom Mr Ryan expresses worshipful praise has said that ‘the weak should not be loved’.
With other Christian voters – who vote all the time, and who vote all the time based on discernment of the issues from Bible study and prayer – we ask: does the TEA Party(ies) support Mr Ryan’s appeal directly to explicitly ANTI-CHRISTIAN influences? And, particularly his indebtedness to Ayn Rand, who is explicitly ANTI-CHRISTIAN.
Like so many, Mr Ryan expresses support to oppose abortion – the unborn are indeed among the weak – BUT his plans mangle support for infants and their families after the unborn are born, exposing his deviant hypocrisy, and the deviance of the Virginia Family Foundation and other such groups. Even TEA Parties, which express an interest in rights of human dignity, appear to care-less about the born after they are born. There is no greater perversion than claiming to respect the rights of human dignity, while contributing to the mangling of human rights. The Creator of our human rights, no doubt, sees these perversions.
Does the TEA Party(ies) support, or not, the pattern of Jesus who did daily preach the gospel and HEAL THE SICK and COMFORT THE OPPRESSED, and among these, the ‘STRANGERS IN THE LAND” – IMMIGRANTS, documented or otherwise? No party and no candidate can claim any part of Jesus without these signs of Christ’s work.
Ms Palin warned about ‘death panels’ hidden in the Affordable Care Act. That was incorrect, by the facts. BUT, the very FACTS of Mr Ryan’s plans – and the recent history of the Republican Virginia legislature and its donors and backers – indicate that the Republicans respect more corporate-oligarchic OVERLORDS and respect less the weak; thereby implementing the ANTI-CHRISTIAN Ayn Rand’s rule: THE WEAK SHOULD NOT BE LOVED.
The Republican’s bumper sticker this year could be:
THE WEAK SHOULD NOT BE LOVED.
Nothing is more ANTI-CHRISTIAN than that.
What does the TEA Party(ies) reply?